• Anderson, Virginia. (2006). ‘Well it’s a vertebrate...’ Performer choice in Cardew’s Treatise. Journal of Musicological Research, 25(3/4), 291–317.
• Appadurai, Arjun. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Ball, Cheryl, & Charlton, Colin. (2015). In Linda Adler-Kassner & Elizabeth Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http://ceball.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/threshold-concepts-multimodal.pdf
• Barthes, Roland. (1977). Musica practica. Image—Music—Text. (Stephen Heath, Trans.). New York, NY: Noonday.
• Bauerlein, Mark. (2009). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupifies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York, NY: Penguin.
• Bayham, Michael, & Prinsloo, Martin (Eds.). (2009). The future of literacy studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bazerman, Charles. (1992). From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: Living with powerful words. In Anne Herrington & Charles Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp. 61-68). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
• Berlin, James. (1996). Rhetoric, poetics, and culture: Refiguring college English studies. Urbana: NCTE.
• Bernabé, Jean, Chamoiseau, Patrick, & Confiant, Raphaël. (1990). Éloge de la créolité/In Praise of Creoleness. (M. B. Taleb-Khyar, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Bernhardt, Steve. (1986). Seeing the text. College Composition & Communication, 37(1), 66-78.
• Berry, Patrick W., Hawisher, Gail E., & Selfe, Cynthia L. (2012). Transnational literate lives in digital times. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.
• Birkets, Sven. (2006). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. New York, NY: Faber and Faber.
• Blanchard, Francoise, & Leven, Jeremy. (2007). Say chic: A collection of French words we can't live without. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Bourdieu, Pierre, & Thompson, John B. (Eds.). (1991). Language and symbolic power. (Gino Raymond & Matthew Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Byram, Michael. (1998). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Briston: Multilingual Matters.
• Calvet, Louis-Jean. (2006). Towards an ecology of world languages. (Andrew Brown, Trans.). London: Polity.
• Canagarajah, Suresh. (2009). Multilingual strategies of negotiating English: From conversation to writing. JAC, 29(1-2), 17-48.
• Canagarajah, Suresh. (2013). Translingual practice: Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Carr, Nicholas. (2008, July/August). Is Google making us stupid? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868
• Confiant, Raphael. (n.d.). Créolité et francophonie: Un éloge de la diversalité. Potomitan.info. Retrieved from http://www.potomitan.info/articles/diversalite.htm
• Cope, Bill, & Kalantzis, Mary (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
• Crawford, James. (2000). At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety. Briston: Multilingual Matters.
• Delagrange, Susan. (2011). Technologies of wonder: Rhetorical practice in a digital world. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.
• Dunn, Patricia A. (2001). Talking, sketching, moving: Multiple literacies in the teaching of writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Firth, Alan, & Wagner, Johannes. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
• Gal, Susan, & Irvine, Judith T. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62(4), 967-1001.
• George, Diana. (2002). From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 54(1), 11–39.
• Harklau, Linda, Losey, Kay M., & Siegal, Meryl (Eds). (1999). Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Hawisher, Gail, & Selfe, Cynthia L. (2010). Globalization, guanxi, and agency: Designing and redesigning the literacies of cyberspace. In Bruce Horner, Min-Zhan Lu, and Paul Kei Matsuda (Eds.), Cross-language relations in composition (pp. 57-80). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Hesse, Doug, & Selfe, Cynthia L. (2010). Interchange on Cynthia L. Selfe’s “The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing.” College Composition and Communication, 61(3), 602-610.
• Horner, Bruce. (1998). On the study of music as material practice. Journal of Musicology, 16, 182-85.
• Horner, Bruce, Donahue, Christiane, & NeCamp, Samantha. (2011). Toward a multilingual composition scholarship: From English only to a translingual norm. College Composition and Communication, 63(2), 269-300.
• Horner, Bruce, & Kopelson, Karen (Eds.). (2014). Reworking English in rhetoric and composition: Global interrogations, local interventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Horner, Bruce, & Lu, Min-Zhan. (2007). Resisting monolingualism in ‘English’: Reading and writing the politics of language. In Viv Ellis, Carol Fox, & Brian Street (Eds.), Rethinking English in schools: Towards a new and constructive stage (pp. 141-57). London: Continuum.
• Horner, Bruce, Lu, Min-Zhan, Jones Royster, Jacqueline, & Trimbur, John. (2011). Language difference in writing: Toward a translingual approach. College English, 73(3), 303-321.
• Horner, Bruce, Lu, Min-Zhan, & Matsuda, Paul Kei (Eds.). (2010). Cross-language relations in composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Horner, Bruce, & Trimbur, John. (2002). English only and U.S. college composition. College Composition and Communication, 53(4), 594-630.
• Jewitt, Carey. (2005). “Multimodality, ‘reading,’ and ‘writing’ in the 21st century.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331.
• Kerman, Joseph. (1979, May 17). William Byrd and the Catholics. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1979/may/17/william-byrd-and-the-catholics.
• Kress, Gunther. (2000), “Multimodality.” In Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Lam, Wan Shun Eva. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-82.
• Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Lu, Min-Zhan. (2004). An essay on the work of composition: Composing English against the order of fast capitalism. College Composition and Communication, 56(1), 16–50.
• McCloud, Scott. (1994). Understanding comics. New York, NY: William Morrow.
• MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. (December 2006). Report of the MLA task force on evaluating scholarship for tenure and promotion. New York: MLA. Retrieved from http://www.mla.org/pdf/taskforcereport0608.pdf
• Olson, David. (1995). Writing and the mind. In James V. Wertsch, Pablo Del Rio, & Amelia Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 95-123). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Parakrama, Arjuna. (1995). De-hegemonizing language standards: Learning from (post)colonial Englishes about “English.” London: MacMillan.
• Pennycook, Alastair. (2008). English as a language always in translation. European Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 33-47.
• Philip, Marlene Nourbese. (1989). She tries her tongue, her silence softly breaks. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island: Ragweed.
• Prior, Paul, Bellwoar, Hannah, Berry, Patrick, Lunsford, Karen, Rohan, Liz, Sheridan-Rabideau, Mary P., Shipka, Jody, Chewning, Bill, Solberg, Janine, Van Ittersum, Derek, & Walker, Joyce R. (Summer 2007). Resituating and re-mediating the canons: A cultural-historical remapping of rhetorical activity (A collaborative webtext). Kairos, 11(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/11.3/index.html
• Ratcliffe, Krista. (1999). Rhetorical listening: A trope for interpretive invention and a “Code of Cross-Cultural Conduct.” College Composition and Communication, 51(2), 195-224.
• Royster, Jacqueline Jones. (1996). When the first voice you hear is not your own. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 29-40.
• Selfe, Cynthia L. (2009). The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 616-63.
• Shepherd, John. (1993). Difference and power in music. In Ruth A. Solie (Ed.), Musicology and difference: Gender and sexuality in music scholarship (pp. 46-65). Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Shepherd, John. (1987). Music and male hegemony. In Richard Leppert and Susan McClary (Eds.), Music in society: The politics of composition, performance and reception (pp. 151-72). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Small, Christopher. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
• Stevens, Ilan. (2004). Spanglish: The making of a new American language. New York: Harper Perennial.
• Street, Brian. (2010). The future of ‘social literacies.’ In Mike Baynham & Mastin Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 21-37). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Trimbur, John. (2000). Composition and the circulation of writing. College Composition and Communication, 52(2), 188-219.
• Trimbur, John, & Press, Karen. (2015). When was multimodality? Modality and the rhetoric of transparency. In Arlene Archer & Esther Breuer (Eds.), Multimodality in writing: The state of the art in theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Leiden: Brill.
• Varnum, Robin. (1986). From crisis to crisis: The evolution toward higher standards of literacy in the United States. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 16(3), 145-165.
• Wang, Xuan. (2010). I am not a qualified dialect rapper: Genre innovation as authenticity. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies No. 64.
• Williams, Raymond. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Winokur, J. (1996). Je Ne Sais What?: A guide to de rigueur Frenglish for readers, writers, and speakers. New York: Plume.
• Wysocki, Anne, & Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (1999). Blinded by the letter: Why are we using literacy as a metaphor for everything else? In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 349-368). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
• Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297-328.
• Yildiz, Yasemin. (2012). Beyond the mother tongue: The postmonolingual condition. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

• Footnotes created with the bigfoot.js jQuery plugin.
• Sticky navigation bar created with the stickUp jQuery plugin.
• Metacommentary toggle button created with the jQuery Toggles plugin.
• Grid layout assembled with the Pure.CSS responsive grid framework.
• Magnifying glass vector icon courtesy of Captain Icon.